قبلة “ليو يانزي”|أهلاً بشريكي المخالف الموسم الثانى Hello Debate Opponent |الحلقة 30 |MangoTV Arabic
”Youth” – Singer: Zhang Cheng ♫ Hey, Shine like the sun ♫ ♫ Hey, Strength starting to ignite ♫ ♫ The vast sky is open to embrace ♫ ♫ We spread our wings and hope to fly ♫
♫ Even if I fall, don’t be afraid to smile and keep running ♫ ♫ Even if there is trouble, I won’t run away, persist till I get old ♫ ♫ Even if I’ve lost everything, I will still be proud ♫
♫ I want to find my life, by myself ♫ ♫ Life is too short, know what is important before it’s too late ♫ ♫ Recall our youthful years ♫ ♫ The enthusiasm of youth floating and fluttering in the wind ♫
♫ Don’t ask the future how much it knows ♫ ♫ Recall our youthful years ♫ ♫ The enthusiasm of youth floating and fluttering in the wind ♫ ♫ Life is too short, know what is important before it’s too late ♫
♫ Recall our youthful years ♫ ♫ The enthusiasm of youth floating and fluttering in the wind ♫ ♫ Life is too short, know what is important before it’s too late ♫ ♫ Recall our youthful years ♫
♫ The enthusiasm of youth floating and fluttering in the wind ♫ [Hello Debate Opponent Season 2] [Episode 30] [1 hour later] Thank you for the speech of the Fourth Debater from the affirmative side. This competition is now over. Now let’s invite all the judges to leave and discuss.
How about we first vote by putting up a hand? Put your hand up if you agree with the affirmative side? Agree with the negative side? How about you two? I haven’t decided. They are quite equal. Right. I also think they are evenly matched. This competition is interesting indeed.
Have you noticed they changed the position at the very beginning? What does this mean? I realized what happened when the competition was almost finished. I’m familiar with these two teams. Here’s what happened. 235 Team used to be the same team as the affirmative side. Their relationship is complicated.
The First Debater of the negative side and the Fourth Debater of the affirmative side are lovers. The Fourth Debater of the affirmative side needs to question the First Debater of the negative side according to the rules. He must be afraid of his girlfriend but still wanted to win the competition;
Therefore, he changed the position with the Third Debater to avoid the problem by questioning the opposing Second Debater. The negative side was probably using Tian Ji’s strategy for horse racing. They wanted their weakest to confront the opponent’s strongest.
But they didn’t expect their opponent’s change, so they themselves also changed their positions between the Third and Fourth Debaters. This saves a bit of their strategy. Good analysis! But anyway, from stating the arguments to questioning from the affirmative side,
The only consensus that the negative side has established is the consensus of definition. They basically didn’t promote their arguments at all. [The Con Side’s first round of questioning] May I ask my opponent, what the use of being sick is? From another perspective, it can strengthen our immunity.
May I ask my opponent, what the use of seeking medicine from a Taoist priest is? It can cultivate your mind from a different perspective. May I ask you what the use of sitting around at home every day is? From a different perspective, it can help you relax and be worry-free.
So are all the useful uses also useless from a different perspective? The useless use is useful. The useful use is useless. The argument of your side is that you can win from a different perspective. Actually the topic for our side is a universal judgment.
Now let’s move on to the next question. Is there a completely useless object? It’s totally a trick. But you still have to fall into it; otherwise, you can only escape. I think she can argue back. Of course, there is. Many civil scientists research perpetual motion. It’s useless to research perpetual motion.
Is it completely useless to research perpetual motion? You see, you have to admit it in the end. No. Everything has its value. So the useless use is also useful. Doesn’t it mean our argument is correct? So the use of uselessness doesn’t exist, right? What are we debating about today then?
If your argument is tenable, this competition shouldn’t exist. Right? It exists! The uselessness of useless use is in the secular context. But the usefulness and uselessness we are talking about is the value. You keep changing the perspective of the secular definition and value judgment. Isn’t it a double standard? Not bad.
It’s not good. They have done only half of their refutation and reduction to absurdity. They didn’t pave the way for the First Debater who talked next. But I think in this round they made the audience think about the definitions of these “uses”. So, I think they hit the mark in this round.
We fulfilled the task. It looks successful. But we didn’t push our argument forward. The reaction of our opponent is too quick. Even if we have time, we still might not be able to push it forward. Let’s see Tuanzi’s performance. Now let’s welcome the First Debater of the negative side to elaborate their arguments.
Thank you, Chairperson. Hi, everyone. If there is one thing useless for me; therefore, I call it “useless use.” Then my opponent will say, “No. It’s useful for Li Er’gou who lives next to me. Isn’t it useful?” This is like talking about: Who says we can’t eat dog food?
Dogs can eat so we can eat dog food. I admit people can eat dog food. But we can’t eat it like rice, right? In a similar way, from what perspective can reading comics help me get into a famous university happily? From what perspective, can chasing idols help me support my family?
These useless uses are a bit useful if you see them from a different perspective. But is it the usefulness that we need? It’s like that we are a debate team. We eat together. We have fun together. We immerse ourselves in the library and we stay up for the whole night.
We become the best friends. We have the best memory. But which team is not like this? The friendship and memory can make us get that trophy? No. There is no competition that will let you win because of these. We can only get the championship by capability and effort. We are all ordinary.
What we need is to attend university, make money to support our family, to do things useful to yourself, to be a useful person. We shouldn’t claim Zhuangzi’s “useless use is greatly useful,” but in the end, our lives become what he called “a dream that is never realized.” Thank you.
Now let’s welcome the Fourth Debater of the affirmative side to question the First Debater of the negative side. – The time is still 2 minutes. – Thank you, Chairperson. – Hi, my opponent. – Hi. Do you think the standards of two usefulnesses in the topic can’t be different?
Of course. Otherwise, it’s confusing one thing with another. So can I understand your argument as useless use is useless, so it is useless. Right? – Well… – Circular argument. – No. – So according to your definition, your argument is nonsense. The key of our argument is useless use is unpractical.
If you must emphasize it as useful, then it is a non-pragmatic behavior. This will mislead many people’s value judgment and behavior. Could you give an example? For example, for a student who is going to take the college entrance exam, reading comics every day is useless. This is a realistic problem.
The First Debater of my side has already answered this question. In your opinion, is there only one path in your life, or can we only have one goal at every stage? Is there actually your narrow value under your practical claim? Thank you. – We didn’t take this round. – This is expected.
It’s okay. Now, its the elaboration of the second round. The Second Debater of the affirmative side elaborates. The Third Debater of the negative side questions. We cleared their battlefield anyway. The next step, we won’t get tangled with the definition. We need to debate for a standard.
They discussed a lot of details. Did you understand? More or less. Really? Thank you, Chairperson. We just reached an agreement. The useless use refers to the useless existence in the utilitarian context. There is no problem with this. The problem is how we can evaluate the useless use?
My side believes that the standard of the evaluation should be multidimensional. If there is no innocent snowflake in an avalanche, then when we make achievements in our life, every book we read, every song we listened to, every place we went to, they are all not useless. Are they not?
When you evaluate the useless use with multidimensional standard, you will see they will always bloom useful flowers in the desert. So my side believes that useless use is useful because this evaluation is more comprehensive, more objective and fair. This will prevent us from
Going to the abyss of arrogance and ignorance guided by the value of utilitarianism. From the second round, the negative side tried to fight back. Evaluations can be multidimensional. I have no problem with this argument. It will be refuted with extreme examples immediately.
My opponent, is the sense of right and wrong an evaluation method? So the evaluation of right and wrong is also multidimensional? There is not only one standard of right and wrong, black and white? They want to use morality to kidnap us.
My opponent, you are right. There is not only one standard for right and wrong, black and white. The hunting dog is good for the hunter but it’s bad for the rabbit. The “three obediences and the four virtues” was right in the feudal society but it’s wrong today, of course.
The sun is white if you look at it with naked eyes but it looks black on film. The world is meant to be complicated. Evaluations are also multidimensional, is there a problem? Do you need to be so tough? So for one thing, both your perspective and my perspective are reasonable.
Does it belong to the multidimensional standard? Of course. So, everyone can claim he/she is right in this case? May I know how can this standard make a judgment and solve problems? It’s a little bit tricky. What is evil if there is no good? What is beauty if there is no ugliness?
The evaluation can be multidimensional but this doesn’t mean we can confuse beauty and ugliness, good and evil. The evaluation towards an object is from its principal contradiction and aspect. This is the standard which should guide our life. Am I right, my opponent? [The elaboration of the Second Debater of the Con Side]
So the opponent keeps doing one thing since the beginning of the competition. That is, they keep on imposing values on useless use, in a forceful way. If you really force it, is there any value that you can’t find? In 2016, a young girl starved to death with her phone in a staircase
Because she was addicted to the online novels. If you really want to find the value of online novels they brought to her, maybe it could only make her die peacefully and happily. How can this use help us apart from making us fall into the nothingness of values?
We hope our opponent doesn’t forget your responsibility as debaters. Don’t forget the most valuable spirit of debating, pursuing the truth. It is what it is. If it’s useless, then admit its uselessness. Thank you. Thank you, Second Debater of the negative side, for the excellent speech.
Now let’s welcome the Third Debater of the affirmative side to question. Please. – Thank you, Chairperson. Hi, my opponent. – Hi. Your side keeps saying that our definition and evaluation are not correct. But you didn’t show your own process of argumentation. Please give an example of useless use which your side approves.
He is really bold. Why do you say that? He let his opponent have the argument during the questioning. This means he himself is very confident. If I was Sister Xiao Hao, I would delay his time and not reply him. Let him waste all his questioning time, right?
My opponent, that’s why you sit here. For example, you go back home on holiday and make a full studying schedule, this is useless use. Making a study plan during the holidays, can help me study during holidays. Isn’t it useful? – But you won’t implement it at all. – That’s right.
So you mean when I don’t use it, it’s useless. Isn’t all the knowledge useless if I don’t use it? Can you give me an example that remains to be useful even if I don’t use it?
“One who is filled with knowledge always behaves in elegance.” This is useful even if you don’t use it. The function of “filling with knowledge” is “behaving in elegance”. How come it’s useless? But there is no direct use. So only direct use is useful?
So all the knowledge isn’t tested in the exam is useless use. You studied it in vain? At least there should be a certain causal relationship. Otherwise, it falls into an endless loop that we give an example and you change perspective.
You still want to deny the existence of useless use and consequently deny the topic? Yes. We accept the definition of useless use in the topic. That is, the object regarded as useless from the perspective of utilitarianism. But my side also advocate clearly that the absolutely useless object doesn’t exist.
This is our revolt over utilitarianism! Because to judge something is useful or useless with a utilitarian approach, it itself is a kind of bias and unfairness. It’s even a castration of our choices in life. Countless useful choices but appear useless are neglected, abandoned, and buried after they were judged to be useless.
From this perspective, we just want to deny the existence of useless use. Because the uselessness my opponent mentioned at the moment probably is usefulness tomorrow. The nothingness at the moment can be the foundation to build up the future.
Like wise men in ancient Greece as well as Owen and Saint-Simon in the 18th Century, they were welcoming the next era amid the seeming uselessness. So, all seeming uselessness is proving a narrow vision. [Pro Side: “The use of uselessness is useful”] We are in the inferior position now. It’s okay. It’s okay.
It’s okay. They are so aggressive. They really denied the topic from the definition. And they rationalized it in the end. We can’t move on if it goes on like this. The coach of the negative side applies for a tactical suspension. The suspension is 3 minutes.
The coaches of the two team are allowed to come on the stage. Adjust the line-up and tactics according to the situation of the first half. The countdown begins now. Sorry, everyone. I made a mistake. It’s okay, Xiao Hao. Our argument hasn’t been beaten. We can continue. Nan Bei, do you want to join?
See you on the stage. I will join. You can replace me. No. It’s better to replace me. I feel I can’t handle it. But with my current performance… Sister Xiao Hao, listen to me.` I can state the arguments. I can also rebut.
But the free debate really needs you to lead to control the situation. I’m really not good at it. All right. Listen to me. Don’t panic. Nobody knows who will win until the end. Tuanzi is right.
Nan Bei, you are the First Debater in charge of the rebuttal now. Others, prepare for the free debate. Okay? – Okay. – Okay. The first half is good. But focusing only on logic is not enough. You should elaborate the second argument more. I suspect that they might have a deeper argument.
Don’t let them present it. Okay? Coach, we have a countermove. I think we can do it. You decide it by yourself. But remember, be responsible for your own decision. At the moment, we are indeed at a disadvantage. But we basically established a consensus. At a disadvantage for the questioning part is not important.
The important thing is, make them fight in our battlefield. For the rebuttal, you will meet either Liu Yanze or Yin Nan. So, don’t rush. Remember, present our arguments. You got it? Got it. Also, make your speech short. Ding Li, for refuting, push the argument forward during the free debate.
Free debate. The whole team needs to defend and fight back. We only have one goal. Strengthen our arguments. Tao Hao, stabilize the situation. Xiaoyu, keep the rhythm. Nan Bei, give the follow-up attack. Ma Nan, control your participation. Present our value in the latter part to connect your conclusion.
– Do you understand? – Yes. Brilliant. As I see it, they don’t have the energy to elaborate their own arguments. I guess they will try their best to refute our arguments. Now, if your arguments are tenable, we win. Understand? – Good luck. – Good luck.
All right. Get ready for the stage. By the way, Old Coach’s surgery was very successful. Good luck, Xiaoyu! [1 on 1 rebuttal] Next is the rebuttal. Any debater from both teams can rebut the previous arguments. You have 4 minutes in total. Please.
Your side stated that useless use is useful. What makes it useful? If you observe from different times, space, and modal length, you will see useless use is very useful. Like the useless tree Zhuangzi saw, it survived from the wood chopper’s axe.
So the characteristic of an object is determined by itself or by the external observation angle? Will the object change with different observation scales? Of course. When I observe an object under the atom scale, I can only see carbon. But back to the macro perspective, I see that it’s a diamond.
A diamond is formed by the carbon atoms lining up in a certain way. What I want to ask is in what way the useless use is changed to be useful? There is an inventor in HeBei Province called Handy Geng. He especially invents things that are totally useless,
So he is super popular on the Internet and becomes the top Internet celebrity. Isn’t it the usefulness of useless use? What if everything he invents is useful? Then it’s not what we are discussing today. You don’t want to answer this directly. The reason why the inventions of Handy Geng can make him famous,
Is because the inventions are useless. So, did you see, the real value of useless use lies in its uselessness. Right? It’s just its basic characteristic. We must admit this basic characteristic, right? The inventions of Handy Geng are useless, then they are useful for him.
The tree itself is useless so it’s useful for its own existence. Reading light literature and comics makes you feel happy because nobody will test you about them. Once they are tested in an exam, it’s useful then. The function of entertaining and relaxing is gone.
The basic science isn’t limited because it doesn’t have a specific goal. So we can explore this world in an unconstrained way. If the scientist’s research must be useful, then the research of basic science will be lifeless. Therefore, when useless use is useless, it’s useful. But when it’s useful, it’s useless. Right?
I suspect that they have a deeper argument. Don’t let them present it. Okay? Coach, we have a countermove. I think we can do it. So you admit this premise, don’t you? Yes. So if your value must evaluate useless use as useful,
You have overthrown the possibility that useless use is useful from the basis. Thank you. If evaluating it as useful, then you overthrow the basis of usefulness. It’s interesting. To be honest, I didn’t expect that they could push deep to this level.
The affirmative side is very experienced. They fought back in the Free Debate part. Now is the most exciting Free Debate part that everyone expects the most. Every side has 4 minutes. We’ll start from the negative side. Confirming the consensus. The premise of usefulness is uselessness. Do you agree?
Yes. But another consensus is the core of our debate, how to evaluate the useless use. To evaluate something, why do you just look at the premise instead of the result ? My opponent, so you don’t look at the premise?
What’s the final judgment? You can only evaluate something when you have the result. Right? From the perspective of utilitarianism, the subject of Philosophy is useless use. Right? But it contains countless wisdom that benefits us in many aspects, isn’t that useful? It can do this because it’s not a practical subject.
If it focuses on practicality, then the history of philosophy will be written as the 100 useful philosophical tips in your daily life or Wittgenstein’s business expertise. (T/N: a famous philosopher) Then the usefulness of your side will be greatly reduced, would it not? Isn’t the useless use useful for life’s accumulation and promotion?
It’s difficult to quantize life’s accumulation and promotion. How does your side judge it being useful or useless? Even if the accumulation and promotion are tiny, it’s still useful. Is it not? Debate Opponent, don’t use it because it’s greatly useless so you use it, or not using it because it’s a little useful.
What does she mean? Yin Nan is taking advantage of Xiaoyu. She implicitly asked Xiaoyu to call her dad. (T/N: the original reference came from the last words of Liu Bei to his son) The human brain consumes 25% of the body’s energy. It is the organ that uses the most energy.
From what you are saying, if I want to lose weight, it’s useful to do advanced math, because after all it uses the brain. Yes. It’s useful even though the effect is tiny. But I did the math at the table for a few days and I gained another 1 kg.
Is doing math questions useful or useless for losing weight? “An untended willow grows”. Isn’t it the usefulness of useless use? Well said. “An untended willow grows” is because we don’t think it’s useful, so it becomes a surprise in the end. Nevertheless, “a watched flower never blooms.” Your first argument is talking about practicality.
Now you are talking about revolt over utilitarianism. Isn’t it self-contradiction? How so? Is practicability equal to utilitarianism? It doesn’t matter. At least we reached another consensus. We all think the evaluation of useless use is against utilitarianism. But to get rid of utilitarianism, we should rely on recognizing the value,
Instead of denying the value. Right? No, to get rid of utilitarianism, is not to place value on uselessness, but to admit uselessness. The useful evaluation is not forced, instead it really does have values. This is what every debater has thought over deeply. because debating itself is typical useless use.
So how can we evaluate debate? Tell the junior brothers and sisters that debate is useless? Then wait to see if there will be no new students joining us next year. Or tell the teammates that debate that it’s useless. Making them lose their spirit in the competition? Or tell myself that debate is useless,
Then deny all the efforts I have made? We can try to find countless useful reasons for debate. Training eloquence and thinking. Cultivate athletics spirit, etc. Like in this competition, your excellent knowledge and skillful technique will definitely come in handy for sure. But where do you use them?
To conquer the audience and get the trophy. Did you see? You are looking for usefulness habitually. Because usefulness makes people feel secure and valuable. What if we try to forget about these? Forget the opponent, forget the audience, forget the trophy, forget everything that is useful. Then think about. What is it
That makes us prepare for the competition in a small room? What is it that makes us argue all night long? The charm that makes us compete east and west. What exactly is it? Now, there is only one question left. Why aren’t we willing to accept uselessness?
As you say, the evaluation of useless use, it will really affect reality. Is there any difference between the two? Because most of the time we only choose those that we deem as useful. “People come and go for their benefits.” If we tell everyone this matter is useless,
Not decorate or place any value on it, its value will be neglected. This is what we are worried about. To most people, what use is useless use? How big is the use? It really cannot be clearly said. But Newton staring blankly under the apple tree, Einstein’s music strings,
Li Bai’s cry after drinking and singing, these all should not be neglected. I understand what you mean. From philosophy and arts to your own hobbies, if it has a useful purpose, then it can make more people follow it, accept it, understand it, respect it. Then, we can choose it more freely.
Not for something’s uselessness to stay far from it. If it weren’t to prepare for this debate topic, I wouldn’t think that till today, there are still people who discriminate against video games. There are also a lot of people who feel that learning Chinese operas is useless because no one listens.
There are even people and groups who believe studying is useless. To ratify uselessness, to say it is useful. It is to make useless use become a part of our free selection. But… there seems to be a bit of a problem. It is only valuable when we firmly believe that it is useful.
Only usefulness is worth being chosen. Actually, this topic is very utilitarian. It is just that we didn’t realize it all along. This is why we are anxious during the entertainment. We blame ourselves during rest. Invisibly, we have all used usefulness to tie our own life. Only giving up usefulness, like us now,
Only when we don’t care about this competition, then we can feel this competition’s real value. Admitting the use of uselessness is useless, it is the biggest resistance to utilitarianism. Only when we are willing to admit that something is useless. When you dare to critique something is useless.
When you are brave enough to respect that something is useless. Then, still choose and enjoy with no regret the so-called useful or useless. Then it is the real freedom. – Right? – Yes. I hope we can become the people who enjoy useless use.
And it so happens that this can make us become the most useful people. Okay. Let’s vote for the final result. Put your hand up if you vote for the affirmative side. ♫ The moment I left my hometown, I started to be homesick ♫
♫ In every disappointing night, missing the home harbor ♫ ♫ I can’t pull onto the shore because the dream is sailing ♫ ♫ The youth will shine under the sun ♫ ♫ This non-fading green halo will permanently sparkle ♫ ♫ Although I ♫
♫ experienced the injury from growth ♫ ♫ It becomes the medal of youth ♫ Say something. Say something. Nothing to say. Take out your noble manners. It is not early, let’s go receive our reward. Let’s go. Go. Go! ♫ The tough vines ♫ ♫ Take the burden, look far ♫
♫ The sea under the clear sky ♫ ♫ No longer the flowers blooming slowly in the greenhouse ♫ ♫ My dream is like ivy leaves ♫ ♫ My fiery dream will forever exist ♫ They become increasingly like a top-ranking team. The negative side, 235 Team, is the champion of this Provincial League. Congratulations!
♫ There is a library there, with you accompanying every day ♫ ♫ Hand in hand, we live under the same roof ♫ ♫ I have you all on the path of growth ♫ ♫ I believe I will come back to the other shore ♫ ♫ On the stage ♫
♫ We overexert ourselves with our own reason ♫ ♫ We are also stubborn towards the truth ♫ ♫ No longer confused, take off the childish garment ♫ ♫ Learn to grow up alone ♫ ♫ Like the green ivy leaves, the tough vines ♫ ♫ Take the burden, look far ♫
♫ The sea under the clear sky ♫ ♫ No longer the flowers blooming slowly in the greenhouse ♫ ♫ My dream is like ivy leaves ♫ ♫ My fiery dream will forever exist ♫ ♫ No longer confused, take off the childish garment ♫ ♫ Learn to grow up alone ♫
♫ Like green ivy leaves, the tough vines ♫ ♫ Take the burden, look far ♫ ♫ The sea under the clear sky ♫ ♫ No longer the flowers blooming slowly in the greenhouse ♫ ♫ My dream is like ivy leaves ♫ ♫ My fiery dream will forever exist ♫
He has just woken up, please be more gentle. – Coach! – Coach. How’s the surgery? Coach. Right. Look. Look. Coach, we won. Coach, we got our revenge. But Nan Bei’s private vengeance has yet to be paid. Coach, thank you. Coach, when will you recover?
When you get better, we have to get hotpot together! You are all… amazing. – Congratulations! – Congratulations! Fine feathers make fine birds. It’s true. You look different. Indeed. You look like a graduate now. Thank you. I really appreciate you all.
– Don’t be like this. I’m not used to this. – Yes. Why are you so polite? I just want to thank you. If I didn’t have you all, I probably would be playing computer games in my room now. Especially I need to thank Xiao Hao, – because… – Sister Xiao Hao!
– Tao Hao, I want to— – Listen to me first. Director Li said he couldn’t find your score for a computer course. – Computer? – Yes. It’s a new required course of this year. Director Li said he told you at the beginning of this semester. You promised him you would go.
Have you taken the course? I thought I just needed to pass the English exam. Where does the computer come from? Director Li said it is a new course for this year. They informed all the students of Year Four. Maybe they missed one Year Five student, you. You won’t blame me, will you?
During your Year Six, 12 months. If your monthly salary is ¥6,000, together with your annual bonus, it will be ¥76,000. Half of that goes to the mortgage, it’s ¥38,000. Calculating in the way, as long as you work 2 part-time jobs every month, you can pay back this ¥38,000.
If you can do this, I won’t be upset. [Showing high ideals, erudition, cultivate moral character, be diligent in action] Where is your Liu Yanze? He normally sticks to you every day. Why isn’t he with you today? He said someone was looking for him. I don’t know who it is. What’s going on there?
So many people. It seems like a love confession. Go. Let’s go and have a look. Oh my god. It’s good. Looks grand. For sure, there is no problem with this kind of scale. It’s like you back then. – You know her? Your friend? – I don’t know her.
But all the tricks on Baidu are the same. After such a long time, nothing special comes out. I think this girl is pretty. Where is the guy? I haven’t seen him. I didn’t see him either. My guy. – Excuse me, I have already— – Hey. I’m from the Sanitary Commission!
What are you doing? You need to clean so many candles on the ground! Also, I’m Liu Yanze’s girlfrend, Xiong Zishi. Who do you want to confess to? Sorry. What do you mean? Explain to me. We haven’t been here for a long time. This time, I feel different compared to before.
The mood has changed but the people are the same. Here you are. What? When I hold an exhibition in the future, it’s my private collection. It’ll be very valuable. When did you take so many photos of me? – You didn’t even Photoshop them for me. – You look good already, why Photoshop?
Channel Manager: brengbo What do you think? Chief Segmenter: nicefly09 Stop! Segmenters: nicefly09, sabrinafair, hana_860, valneijr, karenperez, karasu_006, enayssac. Nan Bei, how is it? – Done? – Soon. Let me see. – Coach. – Right, I’ve booked the plane tickets. Let’s have chicken and pork hotpot before leaving.
There is no such thing in Europe. Sister Xiao Hao. Ma Nan. Hurry and come over. Coming. Coming. I’m making tea for Old Coach. – Coming. – Coming. Old Coach, this is the tea I made especially for you. Thank you.
Shouldn’t each of you give him a cup of tea? (T/N: implying tea ceremony on the wedding day) Nan Bei! – You are using this to take photos? – Yes. – You have to Photoshop me. – Sure. Wait for me. Oh. You are here.
This is the group photo shooting of Team B. It’s improper for me to join. You are Team B’s family. Come. – Come. – Wait a minute. – Right away. – Closer. Closer. Closer. Closer. – Look good? – Is it okay? – Okay. – Okay, get ready.
– Okay. Okay. – 3 seconds. 3, 2, 1, smile. [Half a year later] Chief Editor: kakashiandme Translation Editor: trangxlnguyen_197, rocketbaby Translators: _lulu_, ahn, bzbz888, cscrim, elizabeth_li, holyokeirish_854, jasminezhou, kawaii_2017, lazygrl630, Let’s go. Translators: lidjw, malaika010_985, minnie_dk_95, nicefly09, pbas390_434, samantha_sanders_718, sboerger, shelly_fung, shuchismitabasu2007_113. ♫ Look far, the sea under the clear sky ♫
[This drama is for those who have risked their lives for youth and passion] ♫ My dream is like ivy leaves ♫ [Xie Yu, Debater of Northeast University of Finance and Economics, as Chairperson of the Final Round] [Li Shixuan, Debater of Nanjing Media Academy, as First Debater of Donggang Law University]
[Wang Yawen, Debater of Zhejiang Media College, as Competition Chairperson] [Tang Yiyun, Debater of Southwest Law University, as First Debater of Fuling Academy] [Han Jialin, Debater of Shanghai Commercial College, as Third Debater of Fuling Academy] [Fu Xiaoyue, Debater of Southwest Law University, as First Debater of Pro Side]
[Zhang Shulin, Debater of Xiamen Chengyi College, as Chairperson] [Zhao Kaixin, Debater of Zhongshan University, as Debater of Donggang Jiaotong University] [Qiu Lingyan, Debater of Shanghai Drama College, as First Debater of Nanxiang Technical School] [Yan Wenkai, Debater of Nanjing Aerospace University, as Third Debater of Nanxiang Technical School]
[Guan Yue, Debater of Beijing University, as Fourth Debater of University of Business and Economics] [Wang Yuan, Debater of East China Law School, as Fourth Debater of Nanjiang Drama Academy] [Chan Xiaowei, Debater of Hunan Teacher University, as Third Debater in the exhibition competition]
[Li Peiqi, Debater of Wuhan University, as First Debater in the opening competition] [Jiang Xiangwei, Debater of Wuhan University, as Third Debater in the opening competition] [Ye Minghan, Debater of Jimei University, as Fourth Debater in the opening competition]
[Xia Weitong, Debater of Nanjing Accounting University and Founder of Chinese Debate Competition, as Consultant of this drama] [Peng Feiyu, Captain of Wuhan University Debate Team and Champion of International College Debate Competition, as Final Round Judge] [Yu Xi, Coach of Shanghai University of Business and Economics Debate Team, as Final Round Judge]
[Zhang Gei, Coach of Tongji University Debate Team, as Final Round Judge] [Wang Renjia, Coach of East China Law University Debate Team, as Final Round Judge] [Liu Xiran, Coach of Macau University Debate Team, as Final Round Judge] [Xu Mingze, Debater of Shanghai Drama Academy, as Debate Director of this drama]
[Wang Shilong, Debater of Shanghai Drama Academy, as commentator in the 3-side competition] ”To Be Continued” – Singer: Zhang Xi ♫ All the joy is secretly seeping in ♫ ♫ Some sadness can be comforted but not able to explain ♫
♫ The love I miss will become part of my silence ♫ ♫ The crowd of lost souls moves back and forth ♫ ♫ Counting the Christmas fireworks ♫ ♫ Write a love song for you ♫
♫ Won’t be able to finish singing and continue ♫ ♫ Take all your memories, all your messages ♫ ♫ Delete everything ♫ ♫ Write a love song for you ♫ ♫ Won’t be able to finish singing and continue ♫
♫ I will fill the holes in my heart ♫ ♫ With just our memories ♫ ♫ Write a love song for you ♫ ♫ Won’t be able to finish singing and continue ♫ ♫ I will fill the holes in my heart ♫
♫ With just our memories ♫ ♫ Write a love song for you ♫ ♫ Won’t be able to finish singing and continue ♫ ♫ I will fill the holes in my heart ♫ ♫ With just our memories ♫